[Main Index]

[Previous entry: hammertime]

[Next entry: hasn't worked out like i planned]

04/13/2005: "just the facts, or do you care"

heh. heh heh. heh heh he.

i got a full day off today, which considering that we have no full time bather now, is pretty nice. i guess i should feel bad for Paul, who is going to have to bathe his own dogs prior to grooming, but in my defense there are only about 6 and i needed a full day of R&R. the bad news, or at least sad, is that i was too lazy to get up and drive Dar to the shop, so i am carless...meaning if i want my PSP today, i gotta go get it when she gets home; that's a fly in the ointment b/c on my days off i generally like to start WAC around 3PM. yes, WAC - Wednesday Afternoon Cocktails. i work Fridays till 7PM, get over it.

anywho - since my new plan for today revolves around playing as much online poker as i can stomach and watching as much TiVo as i can swallow, it is possible this could be a multiple post day. prepare accordingly.

i am currently playing in the 7AM Poker Stars $11+Rebuys tourney. we're past the 2nd break and i am lagging in at 43 out of 68 remaining players. the deck has been pretty cold since the end of the rebuy period, so i am not seeing many flops.

on the lighter side, i am watching a portion of my huge reserve of Cheap Seats. if you haven't seen this show, you need to set your TiVo for stun, b/c it is well worth the effort. the Sklar brothers are two stand-up comedians who somehow got hooked up with a sweet gig at ESPN where they get to voice-over Mystery Science Theater 3000-style a vast library of things ESPN obviously used to run in the wee hours of the morning. right now i am watching them annotate the 1994 Spelling Bee and they are killing me. before this episode i watched them ridicule the 1998 WSOP. good show - they crack me up!

ok, i have busted out of the tournament...that happened faster than Kirstie Alley's waist expansion. here are some ugly details:


PokerStars Game #1516787467: Tournament #6885748, Hold'em No Limit - Level X (400/800) - 2005/04/13 - 10:32:13 (ET)
Table '6885748 11' Seat #4 is the button
Seat 2: hippicrit (18491 in chips)
Seat 3: mister MH (45890 in chips)
Seat 4: sellthekids (15948 in chips)
Seat 5: Tarawalie (32925 in chips)
Seat 6: Testarossa (50675 in chips)
Seat 7: lobo86 (49357 in chips)
Seat 8: stjm64 (16192 in chips)
Seat 9: gudfaren (30960 in chips)
hippicrit: posts the ante 50
mister MH: posts the ante 50
sellthekids: posts the ante 50
Tarawalie: posts the ante 50
Testarossa: posts the ante 50
lobo86: posts the ante 50
stjm64: posts the ante 50
gudfaren: posts the ante 50
Tarawalie: posts small blind 400
Testarossa: posts big blind 800
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to sellthekids [Ks Ah]
lobo86: folds
stjm64: folds
gudfaren: folds
hippicrit: raises 1600 to 2400
mister MH: folds
sellthekids: raises 2400 to 4800
Tarawalie: folds
Testarossa: folds
hippicrit: calls 2400
*** FLOP *** [4h 4d 3h]
hippicrit: bets 13641 and is all-in
sellthekids: calls 11098 and is all-in
*** TURN *** [4h 4d 3h] [2d]
*** RIVER *** [4h 4d 3h 2d] [4c]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
hippicrit: shows [3s 6d] (a full house, Fours full of Threes)
sellthekids: shows [Ks Ah] (three of a kind, Fours)
hippicrit collected 33396 from pot
Z-Wyvern is connected
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 33396 | Rake 0
Board [4h 4d 3h 2d 4c]
Seat 2: hippicrit showed [3s 6d] and won (33396) with a full house, Fours full of Threes
Seat 3: mister MH folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: sellthekids (button) showed [Ks Ah] and lost with three of a kind, Fours
Seat 5: Tarawalie (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: Testarossa (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 7: lobo86 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: stjm64 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: gudfaren folded before Flop (didn't bet)


no sense in even trying to understand why this fool would call my re-raise. also no sense in trying to understand why i would go all-in when i missed the flop...but i did read him somewhat right. that's poker, baby.

oh yeah, BTW, the 1998 WSOP on Cheap Seats featured Scotty Nguyen winning the whole thing. he did not utter my new catch phrase though. damn!

time for a shower and some breakfast!

ttfn!

~~~~

i love this "more" section...means i get an extra entry without having to expend the energy of creating a new title, and god knows, that is a lot of work. lazy much?

so i no longer feel bad about work: of the mere 6 dogs on the books today, only 3 showed. nice action! while i should be upset, since that is how i earn money to feed my face and buy alcohol-related products, the truth of the matter is that wed-sat we'll groom probably another 60 dogs. factor in the fact that we are at 75% reservation rate for this weekend, and i am not sweating it. as usual per the spring season, we got more work that we can shake a stick at. praise be the slow day (which i did kinda engineered, but hey, that is the power of answering the phone and booking the appointments.)

in our quest to "grow the business" we are trying to assume the building next to us for a new 3 year lease. being the suburbs, the City of Missouri City (that sounds so sad...nice name) is hesitant to grant us an occupancy permit. it is there contention that we were mis-granted our first permit and that our business shouldn't be where it is anyway. the truth of the matter, although this is just my $.02, is that Missouri City wants this old set of buildings demolished so that new structures can be erected which adhere to the new zoning statues. in suburbia, homogenization is the key to happiness, right? so sad. anyway, today the Assistant City Planner is to come see the place and try to capture an idea of how we are running our business and how we plan to expand. you know, for being fronted on a state highway where the speed limit is frickin' 55MPH, they sure are worried about the noise that dogs could make. gimme a break - the damn cars hurtling past at an average of 65MPH are louder than the dogs. i hate yuppies and the NIMBY mindset. no worries, we only have a client list of roughly 4500 customers...guess we don't serve the public good the way a new Wal-mart would (read that as we won't pay as much in taxes as a new Wal-mart.) umm, asshooooooles (say this in the Fish Called Wanda way.)

so far today i have dropped $22 in SnGs at Party with zero return, plus $43 with no return at Poker Stars. BUT - i am up $10.76 at FTP! been playing $.50/$1 NLHE ring tables, slowly eeeking out my bonus. if you will notice at the bottom right, FTP is the one site where i am negative for the year. i dunno why. well, i know i spent probably $200 playing in SnGs trying to win seats in the WSOP or Howard Lederer's Fantasy Camp. but the other $200+ has been sunk in ring games, with some of those being late night drunk sessions. i know, i know - moronic. i have tried to stop doing that. ;-)

in roughly 3 hours i am going to spend some FTP points and play in some freerolls for the WSOP and, of course, at 3:45PM i am going to play my favorite $11+Rebuy tourney at Poker Stars. i'll check back in later....

[EDIT]
so here is how i keep losing money at FTP: never hitting my draws!




Dealer: Hand #91059971
Dealer: Jackson1 posts the small blind of $0.50
Dealer: tatums1984 posts the big blind of $1
Dealer: You have been dealt [Kc Qc]
Dealer: sylence calls $1
Dealer: VicRattlehead folds
Dealer: whitemike26 folds
Dealer: lil ash folds
Dealer: sellthekids raises to $3
Dealer: proff55 folds
Dealer: gmoney1105 folds
Dealer: Jackson1 folds
Dealer: tatums1984 folds
Dealer: sylence calls $2
Dealer: The flop is [Ac 2s 5c]
Dealer: sylence checks
Dealer: sellthekids bets $7
Dealer: sylence raises to $14
Dealer: sellthekids calls $7
Dealer: The turn is [Js]
Dealer: sylence bets $33
Dealer: sellthekids calls $32.70, and is all in
Dealer: sylence shows [Kh Ad]
Dealer: sellthekids shows [Kc Qc]
Dealer: Uncalled bet of $0.30 returned to sylence
Dealer: The river is [5d]
Dealer: sylence shows two pair, Aces and Fives
Dealer: sellthekids shows a pair of Fives
Dealer: sylence wins the pot ($97.90) with two pair, Aces and Fives
Dealer: sellthekids is sitting out


i'd be interested in hearing from my poker brethern on this matter. am i being a moron for trying to hit cash-game draws like this? i seem to keep doing it....

and yes, i fully realize i should have accepted his check and taken the free card. not sure why he checked; you'd think with his TPTK, he would have been fearing four-to-the-flush.

that's poker, baby!

that's -$105 for today. ugh!
[/EDIT]

Replies: 1 Comment

Why call with with a draw? You want to be the aggessor in that situation. You may have outs but you should assume you are probably behind at this point.

That tourney hand is brutal. Guy should have been folding. Don't see how he could think he was committed to playing the hand.

StB said @ 04/14/2005 01:39 PM CST


proficiently powered by Greymatter and gm-rss 2.0.0

adeptly administered by sellthekids, L.L.C.